With 1,000 responses to our recent survey about an appointed vs. elected state school board, let’s take a final look at the numbers.
And the one that jumps off the page is that 96 percent will vote NO on amendment one to switch from an elected to an appointed state school board on March 3.
As might be expected from readers of this blog, the overwhelming majority are connected to public education. Some 25 percent are retired educators, 24 percent work for a public school system, but are not teachers, and 26 percent are teachers. That adds up to 75 percent.
(Which begs the question, why aren’t the groups who claim to represent various sectors of the education community telling people to vote NO? And how in the world can the Alabama Association of School Boards actually be in favor of amendment one? That is mind-blowing.)
One of the most interesting facts we found is that while it is Senator Del Marsh and his Republican supermajority friends who are backing this amendment, 43 percent of those who answered the survey say they are Republicans. This compares to 35 percent who are Independents and 22 percent who are Democrats. Are Marsh and his cronies that out of touch with their constituents?
But considering what happened in August when the state Republican executive committee met, that is a rhetorical question. On Aug. 24 this 461-member committee met and passed a resolution opposing Marsh’s amendment 64 percent to 36 percent.
Other facts about survey takers: 65 percent were female, 85 percent were Caucasian and 37 percent were 36 to 55 years of age, while 41 percent were 56 to 70.
Why did they vote no? Some 28 percent said they do not want to give up their right to vote and 65 percent said they do not trust the state senate to appoint people to the board who have the best interests of public education at heart. (While the amendment says the governor will appoint nine members to this board, they must be confirmed by the state senate. In other words, Marsh will handpick board members who will, in turn, pick a state superintendent. In effect, Marsh would be the czar of Alabama’s public schools.)
And 92 percent of survey responses say they have “very little” confidence in Marsh doing what is best for schools.
Given his track record on public education since becoming senate majority leader in 2011, this is hardly a surprise. After all, he sponsored the Alabama Accountability Act in 2013 that has now diverted $155 million from the Education Trust Fund to give scholarships to private schools and the charter school act of 2015 which is governed by an APPOINTED state charter commission that has made a mess out of charter applications in both Washington County and Montgomery.
While supporters of amendment one are quick to say those who oppose it simply want to protect the “status quo” in Alabama schools, the survey says this is untrue as 65 percent believe education here is going in the wrong direction.
Why do they feel this way? The fact that when asked to give the legislature a letter grade of A-F, 71 percent handed out either a D or an F is a strong indicator educators blame lawmakers for continuing to set education policy that is anything but helpful to public schools. (Only one respondent out of 1,000 graded the legislature an A.)
I do not know what will happen on March 3. But it is for certain that if amendment one passes, it will not be because of support from those who feel deeply about our schools.
For some of us who are long in the tooth, we can recall that when George Wallace ran for president as a third party candidate, he often said “there was not a dime’s worth of difference between Democrats and Republicans.
And looking at Alabama today, it’s hard to argue with what he said. For all intent and purposes, yesterdays Democrats are now today’s Republicans.
A quick history lesson explains.
After reconstruction, Bourbon Democrats took control of state politics. They were the large landowners, mill and mine owners and anyone with substantial wealth. They were the elites and proved it in 1901 by writing a state constitution that disenfranchised thousands and thousands of yeomen farmers and others they felt were not their equal.
Grandpa was three years old in1901. But he and all his family and neighbors were just clogs in the Bourbon Democrat wheel. They picked their cotton, sawed their lumber, raised their food, mined their coal and worked endless hours in textile mills.
The one thing they did not do was VOTE–unless they paid a poll tax of $1.50 a year because they did not own property. And when you were a sharecropper, as grandpa was, and usually went deeper in debt from one season to another, $1.50 was a handsome price to pay..
Basically the constitution of 1901 said that those who did not own property were second class citizens and were not worthy of having a voice in who got elected to office.
(Grandpa served in World War I and it was only when the probate judge of Covington County gave him a waiver from the poll tax for his military service that he could vote.)
Now the Republican supermajority in the Alabama legislature has adopted the Bourbon Democrat philosophy and has put an amendment on the ballot March 3 that will disenfranchise people across the state by taking away their right to vote for members of the state school board.
Just like the 1901 constitution did to grandpa, the Bourbon Republicans want to make me a second class citizen. They want to hand pick our state school board because they obviously don’t think I–and every other citizen in this state–have enough sense to go to the ballot box and cast an informed vote.
They believe they are smarter than the average citizens of Alabama. We should only been seen and not heard. We should put our fate in the hands of these modern day elites.
And here is my message to them. When I vote NO to amendment one on March 3, I will simply say, “Grandpa, this one is for you.”
Former state senator Phil Williams of Gadsden is Director of Policy Strategy for the Alabama Policy Institute. He recently sent an article to state media pounding his chest about how Alabama has fallen behind Mississippi on National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test scores.
Unfortunately, most of what he said was fiction, rather than fact.
For example, he exclaims, “School choice is evil they said! Well, Mississippi has put in new choice measures and other reforms in leadership and approach in education with, obviously, strong effect.”
The only thing obvious about this statement is that Williams made no attempt to find out what has really happened in Mississippi.
So, I sent Williams’ article to Nancy Loome, executive director of the Parents Campaign in Jackson, MS and asked for her thoughts. (The Parents Campaign is a non-profit that has done amazing work in Mississippi to help the legislature understand what is really important to move education forward.)
Here is what she told me:
“Ha! Crediting school choice with Mississippi’s gains is absolutely laughable, and it is incredibly offensive to the PUBLIC school teachers who worked so hard to move their students forward. We have the most restrictive charter school law in the country. Because of that, we have authorized only six charter schools in the four years our state has allowed them (less than a quarter of one percent of Mississippi public school students are enrolled in charter schools), and their performance has not been stellar..
Our only voucher program is for children with special needs. It serves very few children and none of them participate in NAEP.
Mississippi’s gains are due to targeted funding for teacher training in LETRS (research-based literacy instruction methodology) and for literacy coaches in grades K-3. The gains track directly with spending in early-grade literacy instruction.”
In other words, Williams has absolutely no clue what he is talking about. His suggestion that charter schools account for Mississippi’s success is like saying a football team began winning because they changed their water boy.
As to be expected, the once senator goes on to attack and blame the Alabama Education Association, the elected state school board and universities that train teachers.
Williams’ implication in all of this is that somehow the challenges of Alabama education lie solely at the feet of liberal Democrats who only want to keep the status quo.
Again, he is wrong.
At this moment we are surveying people across the state in regards to the vote on March 3 as to whether we should switch from an elected school board to an appointed board.
More than 600 people have now responded. Some 38 percent identify themselves as Republicans and 38 percent say they are Independent. Exactly the opposite of who Williams wants to blame.
And 57 percent believe our education is going in the wrong direction. So, they are not clinging to whatever the heck Williams thinks the status quo is.
But get this. Why are we not progressing? Because no one has faith or confidence in the legislature that Williams was a part of for eight years. When asked to give the legislature a letter grade, 73 percent handed out either a D or F. Only 20 percent gave them a C.
As to Williams’ plea to switch from an elected board to one that is appointed (like we had 50 years ago that was deemed to be failing). 97 percent say they will vote NO on this amendment.
Why are they voting no? Some 72 percent say they do not trust the state senate to appoint the state school board. In addition, 96 percent say they have very little confidence in senate majority leader Del Marsh to act in the best interest of our schools.
(Under the proposed amendment, the governor will appoint members to the state board—but they must be confirmed by the state senate which Marsh runs with an iron hand.)
Rather than continuing to bellow about what he obviously knows nothing about, Phil Williams would be well-served to go spend four hours as a teacher’s aide in a high poverty classroom to get a taste of the real world. Who knows, he might even figure out why all those republican teachers don’t like the legislature where he used to serve.
He would certainly find it far different than the fantasy world in which he now lives.
So the legislature wants us to vote on March 3 to switch from an elected state school board to an appointed one. But you have to wonder how many supporters of this change know that we once had an appointed state board that was deemed to be failing us–so we changed to what we have now.
Why did we change?
To put more control of education in the hands of voters across the state and to eliminate too much politics in decisions made as to how to run education. In other words, we lost confidence in a hand-picked state school board–which is exactly what senate majority leader Del Marsh now wants.
The legislature created the Alabama Education Study Commission in 1967. Governor Lurleen Wallace appointed Auburn University president Harry Philpott to chair this group. When Albert Brewer became governor on May 7, 1968 he made the work of this commission one of his top priorities.
This report was released on Jan. 16, 1969. Part of this effort was two days of public hearings in Montgomery in November 1968. Among the many recommendations was to go from an elected state school superintendent and appointed state board to an elected state board who would appoint the superintendent.
It was reasoned that an elected board would be more responsive to voters–rather than to a single appointing authority–and that an appointed superintendent could devote full time to education, instead of constantly campaigning to keep their office.
The appointed board served six-year terms and was appointed by the governor.
Governor Brewer called a special session of the legislature in May 1969 to deal with study commission recommendations. Part of his “call” for the special session was, “Legislation to provide for the selection and qualifications of state superintendent of education, local superintendents of education, state board of education and local boards of education.”
Such legislation was passed and an election to vote on this, and a number of other issues, was held on Dec. 9, 1969.
The amendment to switch from appointed to elected passed with 54% of the vote. (66,078 to 56,420)
The education community was solidly in favor of this change. Back then, the Alabama Congress of Parents and Teachers (PTA) was a real power and strongly supported the switch.
The first vote for an elected board was in November 1970 with members taking office in January 1971.
This move was not a rush to judgment It was a very deliberate process with input from many people around the state. But compare this is what the legislature has now done. As best can be determined, a handful of folks decided they know more than anyone else about how to best govern our state school system and they cobbled together this legislation. It was anything but a deliberative, reasonsed approach.
Given their track record in passing such things as the A-F school grading system, the Alabama Accountability Act and the charter school law (which is governed by an appointed board) it’s very difficult to put much faith in education policy cooked up in the Alabama statehouse.
It’s also doubtful that many supporters of Amendment One have bothered to learn the history of why we now do what we do.
If they had, why would they be saying we should go back to a failed system?
Within the last few weeks, Alabama educators have been bombarded by test score results that do precious little to advance progress in our schools and have given politicians and non-educators ample opportunity to wring their hands and declare the sky is falling.
First came the annual school letter grade report that indicated significant improvement for many schools. This prompted some educators to put out press releases and past themselves on the back.
This bill was passed in 2012 and sponsored by Rep. Terri Collins of Decatur. Most educators saw it then for what it really is–virtually meaningless since it concentrates on only math and reading. To prove this point, remember that then state superintendent Tommy Bice appointed a blue-ribbon committee to work with Collins on developing a formula to determine school grades. This was chaired by then Mobile superintendent Martha Peek, who retired in 2018 with 47 years of experience.
Only one problem. They could not please Collins and after two years the committee disbanded. After several more efforts, a formula that satisfied Collins was cobbled together.
I am as guilty as anyone else of bragging about schools making improvement in their scores. But like any good educator, I know we are just playing games. I have talked to countless educators and they all agree that these scores are practically meaningless. Teaching students how to be better test takers is NOT education.
Just how foolish are these scores?
Another creation of the legislature shows us.
We passed the Alabama Accountability Act in 2013, the one that diverts money from the Education Trust Fund to give students scholarships to private schools. This law directs us to declare that the bottom six percent of all schools in the state should be labeled as “failing.”
Where I come from if you are “failing” you get an F. But not in Alabama.
The latest list of failing schools is now public. There are 75 schools on the list, including a charter school in Mobile. But did all 75 get an F on the school report card? Not even close.
Only 19 of them got an F, while 43 were D, 11 were C and two were B.
That’s right. A few weeks after being told they were a B school, J. F. Shields high in Monroe County and R. A. Hubbard high in Lawrence County were told they were “failing” schools.
No wonder educators get frustrated when they have to contend with this kind of politically created nonsense.
And now, fresh on the heels of such foolishness comes all the weeping and wailing about Alabama’s ranking on NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) scores. As we said here many times, NAEP scores are surely the most mis-understood and mis-interpreted measures in education. Go here and here.
So overnight here we go again. All the politicians and non-educators rush to decry the state of education in Alabama. It is as predictable as the sun coming up in the east every morning.
The best example of the silliness of giving too much credence to NAEP came in 2016 when Governor Robert Bentley cast the fifth and deciding vote to hire Massachusetts native Mike Sentance as state superintendent because Massachusetts had the highest 4th grade math scores in the nation according to NAEP. Bentley was convinced that somehow Sentance could push Alabama to the top of the pile because he had roots in Massachusetts.
And we all know how that experiment worked out.
Of course we must do better in Alabama. That has always been the case and always will be. But we need to listen to our best educators for how to go about it and ignore the politicians and non-educators who have proven over and over that they are clueless. And can’t make up their mind if J. F. Shields and R. A. Hubbard are good schools or terrible schools.
Bless his heart, senate majority leader Del Marsh just can’t stop talking to reporters and proving that he is clueless abut our public education system. You can read his latest examples of just plain dumb statements in this article.
As expected, Marsh tries to explain why he wants Alabama voters to give up their right to vote for members of the state school board and let him and his cronies in the state senate handpick board members. Let’s take a closer look at some of his statements.
“I don’t know if it’s personalities, I can’t really say. But at the end of the day, we should all want what is best for the kids of this state and to produce the best education system we can.” Marsh said. “What we’ve got right now does not appear to be functioning and it’s definitely not giving us the results in education, in terms of reading, mathematics, and ACT scores; it’s not happening.”
Senator, what is “not functioning” is you and other legislators passing education laws that make absolutely no sense and simply burden educators with more hoops to jump through for no good reason. Take the charter school law you sponsored for beginners. And don’t forget, charter schools are governed by an APPOINTED commission, you know, like you want to govern all of K-12 education. How is this working?
Take a trip to Washington County and look at the disaster of Woodland Prep charter and the antics of their conman “education consultant” Soner Tarim. Talk about something “not functioning.” And all because of a law you sponsored and put in place.
Marsh also said he does not believe this is taking away the voters right because they will still be able to have a voice in the process through the confirmation process that each appointee has to go through.
“It allows citizens to come down and sit in on that process and to find out what these people’s background really is and their philosophy in education,” Marsh said. “It is a better process to put people in governance for the long-term benefit for the state of Alabama. I firmly believe that.”
Sweet Jesus. Did Senator Marsh really say this? This is another classic example of a politician thinking voters are morons and will fall for anything.
So the public can come to Montgomery and sit in on a confirmation process in which they have ZERO input and this is better than attending a political forum where you can ask questions of candidates for state school board what their positions are?
This makes as much sense as saying I can go to an Auburn football game and boo when Gus Malzahn makes another bone-headed decision and he will change.
“You have to look at the big picture,” Marsh said. “Yes we had some improvement but we’ve got a long way to go.”
The real problem we have is that Senator Marsh does not see ANY picture, much less a big one. He does not understand that when you are dealing with 700,000 students who all have different needs and challenges, improvement of any sort is very, very slow. For him, the BIG picture is focused entirely on test scores, which are hardly a measure of what is going on in a classroom. Teaching a child to become a better test taker is NOT education.
I recently attended an awards ceremony in Gadsden where various people and organizations were celebrated for their work with students with disabilities. It is amazing to see what is being done to prepare these students to become productive, taxpaying citizens. This is not easy work. It takes extremely dedicated educators to do it. But in the senator’s world, none of this counts.
“We’re going to continue to push accountability because the tax payer demands that, and they should,” Marsh said. “And it’s our job to be as accountable as we can.”
So how about Senator Marsh taking a look at his very own Alabama Accountability Act, passed in 2013, with the promise that that it would improve the lives of some of our most challenged students in some of our most challenged school systems? We have now diverted $145 million from the Education Trust Fund so that 3,600 students can get scholarships to private schools. A program that the University of Alabama has studied and says has negligible benefit to those getting scholarships.
In my visits to schools around the state and conversations with countless educators, I have yet to find just ONE who has praise for Senator Marsh and his misguided efforts to impact our schools.
Instead, I remember the conversation with a principal who spoke with Marsh last spring when he wanted to do away with the Alabama College & Career Ready standards. The principal asked the senator what standard did he most object to.
Marsh replied that he had no idea what these standards are all about. The principal told me, “And I wasted 12 minutes of my life talking to this guy.”
Senator, you are a smart man. But you embarrass yourself every time you talk about education.